These are the five concluding recommendations in the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs' report on physician participation in interrogation:

　　Physicians may perform physical and mental assessments of detainees to determine the need for and to provide medical care. When so doing, physicians must disclose to the detainee the extent to which others have access to information included in medical records and should not record or reveal any information against the wishes of the detainee, unless clearly justified by tenets of medical ethics and public health. Treatment must never be conditional on a patient's participation in an interrogation.

　　Physicians must neither conduct nor directly participate in an interrogation, because a role as physician-interrogator undermines the physician's role as healer and thereby erodes trust in the individual physician-interrogator and in the medical profession.

　　Physicians must not monitor interrogations with the intention of intervening in the process, because this constitutes direct participation in interrogation.

　　Physicians may participate in developing effective interrogation strategies for general training purposes. These strategies must not threaten or cause physical injury or mental suffering and must be humane and respect the rights of individuals.

　　When physicians have reason to believe that interrogations are coercive, they must report their observations to the appropriate authorities. If authorities are aware of coercive interrogations but have not intervened, physicians are ethically obligated to report the offenses to independent authorities that have the power to investigate or adjudicate such allegations.

查询更多AMA相关信息在本站>>

《精神病学医学期刊》2006年7月第41卷第13期